Comparison of Patagonia, Uber, Theranos, and Enron

Company Mission & Strategy Governance & Ethics Reason for Investigation/Case How They Addressed It Final Outcome
Patagonia Sustainability-focused, environmental leadership, high-quality products Strong, mission-oriented, family-controlled, ethical No major legal or ethical investigations Proactively commits to ethical sourcing, transparency, and environmental responsibility Successful, respected role model in sustainable business
Uber Rapid growth, technological disruption, scale-driven Mixed; regulatory and ethical controversies Multiple investigations: Regulatory violations, labour exploitation, unethical practices (surge pricing, data privacy breaches, harassment allegations) Implemented regulatory compliance measures, improved driver benefits, changed leadership (CEO change in 2017) Still operational but faces ongoing legal challenges and reputational damage
Theranos Aggressive innovation without proven tech Weak, deceptive, and unethical Fraud investigation: False claims about technology, misleading investors and patients Failed to address concerns; continued deception until exposed by whistleblowers and journalists Collapsed; Holmes & Balwani convicted of fraud, massive financial and reputational losses
Enron Profit-maximization through risky practices Corrupt, unethical, deceptive accounting Corporate fraud: Accounting manipulation (mark-to-market), hiding debt, misleading investors Attempts to hide fraud failed; bankruptcy filed, executives prosecuted Bankrupt; 22 executives convicted, led to Sarbanes-Oxley Act (corporate reform)

Key Takeaways: