Horizontal
Vertical
16/12/20 Proposal →→ 27/10/22 Official Publication →→ 17/02/24 Applicability of the Regulation
Goal of the Proposal:
→ Article 7 (Voluntary own-initiative investigations and legal compliance): Providers of intermediary services shall not be deemed ineligible for the exemptions from liability referred to in Art. 4, 5 and 6 solely because they, in good faith and in a diligent manner, carry out voluntary own-initiative investigations into, or take other measures aimed at detecting, identifying and removing, or disabling access to, illegal content, or take the necessary measures to comply with the requirements of Union law, including the requirements set out in this Regulation
→ new obligations for ISPs: new “due diligence obligations for a transparent and safe online environment”
→ notice and action mechanisms (Art. 16):
→ 4 levels of duties:
All ISPs
Hosting providers
Online platforms
VLOPs and VLOSEs
Very large platforms
Online platforms
Hosting services
Intermediary services
→ old guarantees for ISPs: general monitoring or active fact-finding obligations (Art. 8). There is no general obligation to monitor the information which providers of intermediary services transmit or store, nor actively to seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity shall be imposed on those providers
→ old obligations for ISPs: orders to act against illegal content (Art. 9). This says that “providers of intermediary services shall inform the recipient of the service concerned”. With a “statement of reasons, the possibilities for redress that exist, and a description of the territorial scope of the order”
→ old freedoms of ISPs: terms and conditions (Art. 14). The text states that intermediary service providers must act diligently, objectively, and proportionately when enforcing restrictions. They must respect the rights and legitimate interests of all parties, especially the fundamental rights of service recipients—such as freedom of expression, media pluralism, and other rights under the Charter.